The article states that the American wood companies have no motivation to receive the certification of meet high ecological standards despite many international companies have already received it and provide three reasons for support. On the other hand, the professor explains that American companies have interests to receive this certificate and refutes all of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that the American consumers are exposed to enormous advertising, and other companies attract consumers by using the label. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the consumers are cognizant. He states that consumers can distinguish between slogans and react about trustworthy companies, and independent agencies.
Second, the reading posits that the American consumers always buy the cheaper product and this products cant compete with cheaper prices. The professor says that all people care about price. According to the professor even though American customers care about cheap products but they pay attention to other factors, and if the difference of products is less than five percent they choose the better product. On the other hand, he explains, the American consumers care about their environment.
Third, the article says that the American companies pay attention to markets in foreign countries. The professor opposes this point by explaining about the policy of the companies is different, and they pay attention to foreign competitive more than just sending commodity to abroad countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...to receive this certificate and refutes all of the authors reasons. First of all, the rea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...mers always buy the cheaper product and this products cant compete with cheaper pric...
^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y the cheaper product and this products cant compete with cheaper prices. The profes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61373390558 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71891037245 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532188841202 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4590162132 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390875945149 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145521055236 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821232172697 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226164078725 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697635407293 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.