The reading and the lecture talk about eco-certification of wood companies in the United States of America. The article mentions that American companies do not need to look for eco-certification and provides three reasons of support. The professor, on the other hand, opposes this opinion and casts doubt on all those reasons made by the author. He says that American people would like eco-certification for many reasons.
First of all, the author states that American people would not pay attention to advertisements because they are not trust in them. The lecturer, on the other side, contradicts this opinion by mentioning that American people do not treat all advertisements the same and they differentiate very well between them. Moreover, they trust the independence consumer agency because it has an good international reputation, therefore they will pay attention to what the agency offers.
Second, the writer suggests that the eco-certified wood will be more expensive than regular wood, and the American people very concerned about the price. However, the speaker contradicts this idea when he says that all people are concerned by the price, who does not?, but when the different in price just five percent, American people will start to choose on factors rather than the price especially if they are care about protecting environment like American people.
Third and finally, The author of the reading explains that because American companies do not export their product abroad, they do not need this certification at all. Conversely, The professor opposes this idea as well by illustrating that this would facilitate foreign company to enter American market and compete with domestic companies that do not have eco-certification wood product, especially for American people who concern about environment.
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 78
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 71
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 63
- TOEFL T P O 11 Integrated Writing Task 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and provides three reasons of support. The professor, on the other hand, opposes t...
^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...pendence consumer agency because it has an good international reputation, therefor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43661971831 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0045921344 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514084507042 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7129889364 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436923618557 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180127476654 0.0996497079465 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771598069569 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270372335567 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655526488574 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.