The reading passage discusses an interesting topic about the Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir, a controversial character of the 1700s in Europe, and provides three reasons for support the lack of accuracy of his memoir. However, the lecture casts doubts on the claims of the article and refutes each of the reasons given by the reading passage.
First, the reading passage explains that the memoirs reports wrongly that Chevalier was a wealthy man, when the reality pointed that he had to borrow an important amount of money from a Swiss merchant. On the contrary, the lecture justifies the borrow done by Chevalier by arguing that his need of cash, in the gap of selling his house and receiving the payment, forced him to ask for the load and that is not a sign of lack of wealthy.
Secondly, the reading passages argues about the skepticism of critics about the accuracy of his conversation with Voltair sustaining that nobody could have remembered the exactly words of a conversation occurred many years before. The lecture challenges this point by explaining that Chevalier actually wrote the conversation immediately after of having it with Voltair and that Chevalier continuously consulted his notes when writing the memoir.
Finally, the reading passage exposes how critics rejects the idea of Chevalier escaping form a Venice's prison. They sustains that the truth was that good friend of Chevalier in Venice payed the bribe who free him. In opposition, the lecture exposes how some document's records tells about a reconstruction done on the roof of the prison from where Chevaliers described to escape in his memoir. In addition, many others prisoners had more powerful friends than Chevalier and even though they could not get their freedom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... On the contrary, the lecture justifies the borrow done by Chevalier by arguing that his n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'sustain'
Suggestion: sustain
...er escaping form a Venices prison. They sustains that the truth was that good friend of ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14335664336 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66028774967 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1043910251 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.1 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484774634481 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182849683903 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550354390903 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280241834078 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579416626354 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.