The reading passage discusses an interesting topic about the decline of the Torreya taxifoha, since 1950, and provides intensive information and three options about how to protec this specie. However, the lecturer casts doubt on every suggestion the author of the reading passage propones to save the tree.
First of all, the reading passage suggests to reestablish the tree in its native location as it was thousands of years ago. According to the reading passage, this loation presents a unique microclimate that is optime for Torreya. This point is challenged by the lecturer by explaining that that particular microclime, located in the northern part of Florida, doesn't exist anymore. In fact, global warming and Florida drain could be the causes of this unfortunately phenomena according to the lecture.
Secondly, the reading passage proposes to move Torreya to a cooler location further north where a better climate could reinsert the tree susseccfully. On the contrary, the lecturer disagrees with this idea because this relocation could provoke an ecologic dissaster. To illustrate this issue, the lecturer brings up the example of a specie that, after its relocation, started to grown uncontolably killing many other species around.
Finally, the author of the reading passages sustains the idea of preserve Torreya in research centers with monitored environment to ensure the survival of the specie. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that this option is imposible to implemment as the centers have not the capacity to sustain the life of the tree for a long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests reestablishing'.
Suggestion: suggests reestablishing
...e. First of all, the reading passage suggests to reestablish the tree in its native location as it w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ocated in the northern part of Florida, doesnt exist anymore. In fact, global warming ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, in fact, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32270916335 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73827225641 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9370248132 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239851736456 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918936095765 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551936091543 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146758227728 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319541241042 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.