The reading passage discusses an interesting topic about humpback whales migration using the starts to cover long distances, and provides three main reasons for supporting. However, the lecture casts doubts on the claims exposed by the article. He thinks that the reason whales can migrate long distance has nothing to do with the starts.
First, the reading passage relates the high level of intelligent and ability to develop abstract cognitive thoughts in humpback whales with the capability of reading starts as a guide to travel long distance. On the contrary, the lecture explains that there is no evidence that could relate intelligence with the skill to navigate by the starts. In addition, the lecture includes the example of ducks as an animal with medium or low intelligence able to migrate without problem. In clonclusion, the lecture supports that the instict factor over the intelligence is the reason why whales can migrate successfully for long distances.
Second, the reading passages stablishes than the reason whales can migrate in straigh lines is because they can orient themselves by the starts. In opposition, the lecture refutes this idea explaining that most animals, including whales, use the earth magnetic force to guide them in their journey. Moreover, whales has a biomagnectic organ that works as a sensor of the magnetic field.
Finally, the reading passages supports the idea humpback whales can read the start for migrate long distance by their spy-hopping behaviour: their heads come above the water to observe the stars. This argument is rebutted by the lecture claiming that whales present this same behaviour also during the day. Furthermore, other animals, like sharks, also do spy-hopping looking for a prey. Therefore, there is no evidences whales are using the start as a guide to travel long distances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...son whales can migrate in straigh lines is because they can orient themselves by the start...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no evidences'?
Suggestion: there are no evidences
...-hopping looking for a prey. Therefore, there is no evidences whales are using the start as a guide t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'evidences'' or 'evidence's'?
Suggestion: evidences'; evidence's
...king for a prey. Therefore, there is no evidences whales are using the start as a guide t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28813559322 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64955102895 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522033898305 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.465316217 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362806363667 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128498374342 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685615354073 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235871769789 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436918628042 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.