The reading passage discusses an interesting topic about the decline of the tree, Torreya taxifoha, in Florida, and provides three possible solution to avoid the extinction of the tree. However, the lecture casts doubts on these solutions and refutes all of the options elaborates by the article.
First, the idea to reestablish the tree in the same location where this plant is original is refuted by the lecture, who explains this same location already suffered the consequences of the global warming and now is completely changed. As a result of this, the area became drier and warmer which are condition no good for the Torreya.
Secondly, the lecture also challenges the idea of the reading passage that proposes the alternative of an assisted migration by relocating the tree to an area much further to the north. Thus, a colder weather, friendly for the plant, could be better for its grow. This argument is challenged by the lecture explaining that an assisted migration could cause more harm than good, and to illustrated this idea recall the situation with a local plant and how much damage an alien species could be for the rest of the environment.
Finally, the reading passage offers the option to preserve the tree in a research center. Again, the lecture disagrees with the article by arguing that the Torreya's seed needs diversity and big areas to develop successfully, and those are condition that a small center does not have and will provoke the fail of the preservation of the Torreya in a long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s doubts on these solutions and refutes all of the options elaborates by the article. F...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.953307393 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6152491715 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568093385214 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0354850828 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.444444444 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313909151633 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121590439921 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662134546117 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174947668486 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368960761747 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.