Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better?
There is no shortage of debate about the amount and diversity of subjects a student should take for a better education during the university. Without a question, some people would believe is better for the students to embrace as many topic as they can during his or her education; others may consider the opposite point of view and prefer to focus in their specialization. As far as I am concerned, I deeply believe the first scenario is the best option: it is better for a student to study a variety of topic when he or she attends the university. I think this way, mainly for two reasons I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, a diversity of topic can bring a better understanding of an area of expertise a student would like to embrace. In other words, different factors can affect a object of study with different result and only with the analysis of many other subjects in view it could be understood. Consequently, the study and analysis of many disciplines could bring a global point of view to understand better a phenomenon of study. For example, when I was student in an art school I was interested in music, but could no find the instrument that could be best for me. Surprisingly, when I start to study computer programming and software, I realised that my passion was composing and sound editing. In brief, I would not have the opportunity to comprehend this situation without attending a diversity of classes.
Secondly, a variety of subjects to study would bring a stronger background in knowledge and cultural support for any specialization. Moreover, study a diversity of subjects could be complementary and enrich the main topic a student is focused in. To illustrate this, lets consider my own experience. I remember to improve considerable my writing skills when I coursed journalism. The way a news should be written in a briefly space tough me how to summarise the information effectively in many of the essays and researches analysis I had elaborated later in my career.
In conclusion, I deeply believe that the requirement of some university to students to course different subjects is better than focusing in only the one. I feel this way because this would bring a better understanding of the area they are specializing, and second, because it would provide them a stronger cultural and knowledge background.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun topic seems to be countable; consider using: 'many topics'.
Suggestion: many topics
...s better for the students to embrace as many topic as they can during his or her education...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...her words, different factors can affect a object of study with different result a...
^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('briefly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('space') instead of another adjective.
...sm. The way a news should be written in a briefly space tough me how to summarise the informati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, i think, in brief, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88528678304 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00440697613 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473815461347 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0893495138 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.235294118 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222502712293 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710760926691 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919670887066 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143131099268 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624253502593 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.