The reading passage discuss an interesting topic about the decline of bird population, in the United States, and provides extensive information with three reasons for support. However, the lecture casts doubt on this claim. According to her, the birds population are improving, and even though, the lecture agrees in some of the statements, she opposes to every reason of the reading passage.
First of all, the reading passage sustains that bird's natural habitats are disappearing because the increment of urban areas. On the contrary, the lecture arguments that urban areas, far from reduce bird's habitats, provides new ones. Moreover, according to the lecture, species like pigeons, ceagals, and even falcons, and halks hunting for mouses and small animals, can be seen in every town and city.
Secondly, the reading passage states that the expand of agriculture plays a negative effect on the bird's population. On the other hand, the lecture, again, refutes this claim. By this token, she explains that less land is used for agriculture as consequence of a more effective type of crops that provide more food per unit of land.
Finally, the reading passage blames the increment of the use of chemical pesticides to a future decline of bird's population. This idea is challenged by the lecture based on the awareness of the public about the disavantages of the use of chemical pesticides. Additionally, the lecture mentions the introduction of a stronger type of crops, more pest resistant. Consequently, it will not require so much chemical as use to. Thus, the lecture once again refutes the reading passage's point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...bt on this claim. According to her, the birds population are improving, and even thou...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... and even though, the lecture agrees in some of the statements, she opposes to every reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...condly, the reading passage states that the expand of agriculture plays a negative effect ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...iculture plays a negative effect on the birds population. On the other hand, the lect...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21755725191 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72342887852 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.301215788 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253749292938 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827170169958 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611150754801 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148467443786 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182501080497 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.