The reading and lecture are both about memoir of chevalier, which is on his life and adventure. The author of reading believes that he distorted many incorrect events to make his life seems very excited. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article. He thinks that memoir is possible correct based on history resource.
First of all, the author points out that in his memoir Chevalier asserted, he is very wealthy spending on parties and gamble. It is mention that he would have not borrowed money if he was very rich according to evidence. This point is challenged by lecturer. He says that borrowed money doesn’t indicate he was poor. Furthermore, he argues that because of gambling Chevalier came out of cash, thus he sold his properties to Swiss merchant.
Secondly, the author contends that critics complain accuracy of the conversations between Chevalier and famous writer Voltair in the memoir. The article notes that it is impossible to capture the exact phrases of conversation which happened many years earlier. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that Chevalier notes down everything he remembered after meeting with Voltair and refer to it while writing the memoir.
Finally, the author state that critics questioned on Chevalier escaped from prison. The article establishes that he had political well-contact to bribe him out of prison. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that hard to bribe in prison even though other prisoner had more powerful political contact to bribe them, thus he escaped through ceiling that’s why the government had to repaired it.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims and theories present in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts to make his life seems very excited. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17562724014 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65963345839 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6285709222 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9411764706 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497463252986 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142969483727 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820744108402 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22840171888 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101866384105 0.0443174109184 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.