TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki

The Reading passage raises several doubts about the accuracy of the memoir written by the Chevalier deSeingalt, whereas the professor defends the memoir in the lecture by clarifying the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier’s accounts.
The professor argues that because the Chevalier was rich in assets but poor in cash while he was living in Switzerland, he occasionally had to borrow funds to pay for expensive recreational activities. According to the professor, having low amounts of cash is not the same as being financially poor. The reading, however, holds that as someone who had to borrow large amounts of money from others, the Chevalier must have fabricated stories of his wealthy life in Switzerland.
Moreover, the professor challenges the skepticism expressed in the reading regarding the reliability of the conversations with votaries that the Chevalier recorded in his memoir. She explains that because the Chevalier had a habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately after they met, he was able to recall those discussions in detail even years later.
Finally the professor rejects the claim in the reading that the Chevalier bribed his way out of a prison in Venice. She says that the pact that none of the other prisoners, even those with better resources, had been able to do so shows that bribery was unlikely. Furthermore, she points to a government paper that recorded the repair work done to the Chevalier’s prison cell, citing this as strong evidence that the account of his escape from the prison was indeed accurate.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...iscussions in detail even years later. Finally the professor rejects the claim in the ...
^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'while']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258865248227 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.156028368794 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.063829787234 0.0723426182421 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0425531914894 0.0435111971325 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0390070921986 0.0277247811725 141% => OK
Prepositions: 0.166666666667 0.128828473217 129% => OK
Participles: 0.0531914893617 0.0370669169778 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.98247470547 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0283687943262 0.0208969081088 136% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.13829787234 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00354609929078 0.0158828679856 22% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00709219858156 0.0114777025283 62% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1576.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 253.0 271.125827815 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22924901186 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395256916996 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.300395256917 0.287516216867 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205533596838 0.187439937562 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169960474308 0.113142543107 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98247470547 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569169960474 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 57.0507444151 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 28.1111111111 21.7502111507 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6354230142 49.3711431718 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.111111111 132.220823453 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 21.7502111507 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.878197800319 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 58.1506368028 50.5018328374 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.01492537313 1.90840788429 106% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.717660947949 0.549887131256 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153141539516 0.142949733639 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0305108116853 0.0787303798458 39% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.73447699811 0.631733273073 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116491418227 0.139662658121 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.421370253153 0.266732575781 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11511715452 0.103435571967 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.482325736232 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0881175254791 0.0530846634433 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.556921155667 0.40443939384 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250103685204 0.0528353158467 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.