TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki

The reading indicates that Chevalier de Seingalt’s long memoir does not have one hundred percentage accuracy and provides three reasons. On the other hand, the professor states that although we cannot say this memoir has the highest level accuracy, we can consider it as a reliable historical source and the professor refutes each of author's reasons.

First, the reading claims that base of this memoir Chevalier had parties and spent lots of money, but evidence indicated that he borrowed money and it conflicts with being such a rich person. However, the professor says that in business you have to let your money go and wait to gain more money and in that time Chevalier had to borrow money until his own money got back.

In addition, the reading says that Chevalier could not remember his conversation with famous writer Voltaire after so many years and depicted it in his memoir exactly. On the other hand, professor refers to Chevalier's roommate's status and says he each night after conversation took a note and looked back to them after so many years.

Finally, although the reading advocates that Chevalier could not escape from notorious prison on his own through ceiling and he probably took his friends help, the professor is of the conviction that other prisoner had more powerful friends than he did and refers to government's documents that shows after escaping they had to repair ceiling.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'in addition', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27734375 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.15234375 0.158904122519 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0703125 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05078125 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0703125 0.0277247811725 254% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125 0.128828473217 97% => OK
Participles: 0.01171875 0.0370669169778 32% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.51370170121 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02734375 0.0208969081088 131% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.078125 0.128158765124 61% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015625 0.0158828679856 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00390625 0.0114777025283 34% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1416.0 1645.83664459 86% => OK
No of words: 235.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02553191489 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357446808511 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268085106383 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208510638298 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114893617021 0.113142543107 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51370170121 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565957446809 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.0479391974 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 33.5714285714 21.7502111507 154% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3607019112 49.3711431718 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 202.285714286 132.220823453 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 21.7502111507 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 0.878197800319 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 60.3799392097 50.5018328374 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.51428571429 1.90840788429 79% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.645204788467 0.549887131256 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.207771104534 0.142949733639 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0495115227307 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.769688036152 0.631733273073 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114819065172 0.139662658121 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.353196183712 0.266732575781 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753995340556 0.103435571967 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.261253056554 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0327808833118 0.0530846634433 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.438427777461 0.40443939384 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390605722873 0.0528353158467 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.62251655629 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.