The reading contends that the Chevalier’s memoir may contain several invented passages with the purpose to make his life more exciting and glamour than it was. The professor disagrees with this theory and explains her point of view using few points.
First, the reading says that the Chevalier was not as wealthy as I wrote because he had to borrow a large sum of money when he was in Switzerland in order to sustain his party and gambling life. The professor contrasts this saying that he had to borrow the money because is richness was invested in estate property and he needed some to time to sell them and get the cash.
Secondly, critics think that the conversation that Chevalier had with Voltaire cannot be realistic because of the use of details that cannot be remembered at the time when it was written, many years later the conversation occurred. The professor simply explains that the details are coming from the notes that Chevalier has taken during the conversation and kept with all the other notes as he was used to doing.
Furthermore, critics cast doubts about the story of Chevalier’s escape from a prison in Italy because they think that most probably Chevalier made is way out bribing the prison’s guards, and not making a way out through a hole in the roof as Chevalier’ memoir states. The professor also contrasts this theory explaining that in the same prison there were people more influent and powerful than him that could also have bribed the guards, but they did not. In addition according to some historical records in the period after the Chevalier escape, the ceiling of his cell has been repaired, indicating that what Chevalier wrote was true.
In conclusion, the critics think that Chevalier could have lied about some events of his life, but the further information and historical details provided by the professor contrast what the critics stated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 475, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...bribed the guards, but they did not. In addition according to some historical records in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lain'.
Suggestion: lain
...critics think that Chevalier could have lied about some events of his life, but the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.984375 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65966508406 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521875 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5068812113 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.5 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 21.698381199 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482700429643 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181912141443 0.0996497079465 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079461726017 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250747006911 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594013183603 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.