TPO 08- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
The article states that critic claim that the chevalier distorted or invented many event in his memoir, and provide three reasons of support. however, the professor explains that memoir was acuurate and reliable, and refutes each of authors reasons.
First, the reading claims that chevalier actualy was poor and pretended to be wealthy and made parties and gambling to show this by borrowing money from swiss merchant. the professor refutes this point by saying that chevalier was not poor and he was selling his own properities to cover his actions and he bowrroed money until he recives money from selling.
Second, the article posits that the conversations with voltair was not accurate because its wrote many years after conversatons in memoir. however, the professor says that he wrote notes every night after conversations and kept notes for several yeas then used them in memoir .
Third, the reading says that his escaping from prison from sealing by piece of metal is not acuurate and jailers were bribed by politician to release him. the professor opposes this point by eplaining that where were other prisoners whom had friend with more powerfull politicians and non of them released. she states that soon after chevalier escaped the adminstrative of jail ordered to repair the sealing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun event seems to be countable; consider using: 'many events'.
Suggestion: many events
...hat the chevalier distorted or invented many event in his memoir, and provide three reason...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
..., and provide three reasons of support. however, the professor explains that memoir was...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...by borrowing money from swiss merchant. the professor refutes this point by saying ...
^^^
Line 13, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...any years after conversatons in memoir. however, the professor says that he wrote notes...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...or several yeas then used them in memoir . Third, the reading says that hi...
^^
Line 19, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...re bribed by politician to release him. the professor opposes this point by eplaini...
^^^
Line 19, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...l politicians and non of them released. she states that soon after chevalier escape...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2654028436 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47752445951 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587677725118 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9058123036 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405522370975 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153472120237 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709859503233 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22681914536 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530801292709 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.