Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
For example, in his memoir the Chevalier claims that while living in Switzerland, he was very wealthy, and it is known that he spent a great deal of money there on parties and gambling. However, evidence has recently surfaced that the Chevalier borrowed considerable sums of money from a Swiss merchant. Critics thus argue that if the Chevalier had really been very rich, he would not have needed to borrow money.
Critics are also skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations that the Chevalier records in the memoir between himself and the famous writer Voltaire. No one doubts that the Chevalier and Voltaire met and conversed. However, critics complain that the memoir cannot possibly capture these conversations accurately, because it was written many years after the conversations occurred. Critics point out that it is impossible to remember exact phrases from extended conversations held many years earlier.
Critics have also questioned the memoir's account of the Chevalier's escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy. He claims to have escaped the Venetian prison by using a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof. Critics claim that while such a daring escape makes for enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the Chevaliers jailers were bribed to free him. They point out that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered a bribe.
The reading states that Chevalier memoir is plausible and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He explains that Chevalier memoir's are believable and has a reliable historical source and then lecturer refutes each of the author's claims.
First of all, the reading states that since Chivalier had borrowed considerable amount of money from swiss merchanct, so critics argue that Chevalier was a rich man and spent lot of money on parties and gambling. This psecific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that to considere
borrowing not to indicate that he was a poor. Additionally, the lecturer claims that he had alots of assest then to convert his asset into money and spent in on perties and gambloing. if they had not enough money it would not possible.so, this argumer's argument does not hold water.
Secondly, the lecturer posits that it would not possible to capure every conversation accurately
between Chevalier and voltaire. In the article it is said that it is not possible to remeber exact phrases from extended conversation held from many years.The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim that
Chevalier made it possible because he wrote down every important things after their conversation.
Furthermore, lecturer says that Chevalier mainatin his notes during long time and then he write down his memoir. thus it could possible because he confirm this after the consultan woth journal and his own mwmory.
Finally, the arguer claims that Critics hade made some doubtes of the Chevalier memoir's to
escape from the notorious prison in venice. Moreover, the article says that Chevalier's escaping from prisom not by the uses a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climbing through the roof, he actually had a number of political friends and they would offered a bride. In contrats, the lecturer's position is that other prisoner also had a friends but they did not occure any helps so, it is possibility thet Chevalier escape from the prison by the uses of metal. Furthermore, the jailer report revelas that jail made some repair and this is actually indicate the Chevalier escape.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Borrowing
...e lecturer. He says that to considere borrowing not to indicate that he was a poor. Add...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... borrowing not to indicate that he was a poor. Additionally, the lecturer claims that...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... and spent in on perties and gambloing. if they had not enough money it would not ...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Between
... capure every conversation accurately between Chevalier and voltaire. In the article ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ended conversation held from many years.The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim th...
^^^
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecturer, however, rebuts this claim that Chevalier made it possible because he wr...
^^^^
Line 17, column 91, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'writes'.
Suggestion: writes
... his notes during long time and then he write down his memoir. thus it could possible...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...time and then he write down his memoir. thus it could possible because he confirm th...
^^^^
Line 17, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...time and then he write down his memoir. thus it could possible because he confirm th...
^^^^
Line 17, column 148, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'confirms'.
Suggestion: confirms
...moir. thus it could possible because he confirm this after the consultan woth journal a...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some doubtes of the Chevalier memoirs to escape from the notorious prison in veni...
^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Escape
... doubtes of the Chevalier memoirs to escape from the notorious prison in venice. Mo...
^^^^^^
Line 23, column 264, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'offer'
Suggestion: offer
...ber of political friends and they would offered a bride. In contrats, the lecturers pos...
^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 349, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a friend' or simply 'friends'?
Suggestion: a friend; friends
...osition is that other prisoner also had a friends but they did not occure any helps so, i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 562, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'indicated'.
Suggestion: indicated
...l made some repair and this is actually indicate the Chevalier escape.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 358.0 270.72406181 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14245810056 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60698190837 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516759776536 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4286769671 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.09492273731 220% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 4.19205298013 358% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201067233024 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715387001253 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637057288588 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921276406578 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659158560449 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.