Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.
First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.
Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error.
Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood.
For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.
The reading states that although some evidence reveals that this is Rembrandt painting but also have some inconsistency that's why it would not his painting and provides three reasons for support. the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He explains that by the analysis of recent procedure it is proved that Rembrandt was made this indeed and provides three reasons for support.
First of all, the reading states that this protait has showes some inconsistancy like servent wear White linen cap but the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collat that not servent could afford. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that according to the X-ray result of analysis of color pigmantation of prainting shows that woman originally wear a simple cloath but after that someone overlaping and put down luxurious fur collat for appearing aristocratic woman.
seecondly, the article states that this painting's light and shadow's effects do not fix together. In the article it is said that this panting's woman faces absorb light rather than reflevts any light, also the face partially in shadow that error rambrandt would never have made such an error. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim that original paintaing was not any shadows effects,though is hapeening in this paintaing but after the remove and reveal original paintaing shows that original painting's woman face reflects some light and that'why indicate this was actually Rembrandt prainting.
Finally, the arguer posits that this painting panel made of several pieces of wood glued. but rembrandt painted on wood panels. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that to increase the value of this paintaing and grade,so they added extra color. As are sult wood glued bounded by together. Furthermore, the lecturer says that this paintig wood and others paintaiong of Rembrandt had made by the same trees wood. So, they indicate hat this are rembrendt painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...inting but also have some inconsistency thats why it would not his painting and provi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...and provides three reasons for support. the lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Seecondly
... for appearing aristocratic woman. seecondly, the article states that this paintings...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ogether. In the article it is said that this pantings woman faces absorb light rathe...
^^^^
Line 11, column 384, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , though
...al paintaing was not any shadows effects,though is hapeening in this paintaing but afte...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...l made of several pieces of wood glued. but rembrandt painted on wood panels. In co...
^^^
Line 15, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
...se the value of this paintaing and grade,so they added extra color. As are sult woo...
^^^
Line 15, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng and grade,so they added extra color. As are sult wood glued bounded by together...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26349206349 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52853505888 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4104301452 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150525773426 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628556431693 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868224412199 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967246715094 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056087986499 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.