In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent) of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option.
The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits.
For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate.
Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure
The reading states that four days workweek and four-fifths of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole and the individual company, also the employees and provides three reasons of support.
the lecturer refutes this claim made by the author. He explains that this plane has not effective for the company, also not for employees and refutes each of the author's claims.
Firstly, The article states that the shortened workweek would increase the company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert. the article states that this option also helps the company to hire new employees
but not needed extra money because four-days employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer.
He says that this option would be expended more money because adding to a new worker, the company needed to arrange new training
and medical methods and to ensure these benefits, the profit actually cut down and not to increase.
Secondly, the article posits that This option offering to reduce the unemployment rates.
The article said that new employees could be hired at the 80 percent rate since every four
employees who want on an 80 percent week. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim that hiring new workers means to expend more money. As a result, the company would like to cover up their
expenses and then offer to the work overtime. For these reasons no new opportunity actually produces. Additionally, the lecturer says that the company tries to output the same amount of product that actually occurs from five days workers that means companies production has made constantly and does not needed extra work and also not produce any new position.
Finally, the author argues that this option is better for individual employees because they spend their extra time with their families and
enjoying leisure activities also pursuing private interests. In contrast, the lecturer position is that this option has some risk because it would happen some job fire because employee loses their job stability could lose their job.
The lecturer also notes that the company might be a promotion from the manager level and also those people are more dedicated and like to work five days a weekend.
Thus, this option bringing individual loses rather than any benefits. so, this option is highly impractical and unconvincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nd provides three reasons of support. the lecturer refutes this claim made by the...
^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...oyees would feel more rested and alert. the article states that this option also he...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...lps the company to hire new employees but not needed extra money because four-day...
^^^
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. this specific argument is challenged by the ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ompany needed to arrange new training and medical methods and to ensure these ben...
^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employees
... the 80 percent rate since every four employees who want on an 80 percent week. The lec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ever, rebuts this claim that hiring new workers means to expend more money. As a result...
^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Expenses
... company would like to cover up their expenses and then offer to the work overtime. Fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 304, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'need'
Suggestion: need
...uction has made constantly and does not needed extra work and also not produce any new...
^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Enjoying
...ir extra time with their families and enjoying leisure activities also pursuing privat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ividual loses rather than any benefits. so, this option is highly impractical and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1373.03311258 148% => OK
No of words: 393.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18575063613 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36137799357 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493638676845 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.917022791 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.09492273731 342% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212142064266 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675587181961 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546028448205 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781459330109 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050396867864 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.