Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees. Through genetic modification, it is possible to create trees that produce more fruits, grow faster, or withstand adverse conditions. Planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits.
Firstly, genetically modified trees are designed to be hardier than nature trees; that is, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. In Hawaii, for example, a new pest-resistant species of papaya trees has been developed in response to ringspot virus infections that have repeatedly damaged the native papaya tree population. Planting the genetically modified papayas has largely put an end to the ringspot problem.
Moreover, genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. Genetically modified trees tend to grow faster, give greater yields of food, fruit, or other products and be hardier. This allows tree farmers to get faster and greater returns on their farming investment and save on pesticides as well.
Finally, the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. Because of the growing demand for firewood or building timber, many forests around the world are being cut down faster than they can be replaced. Introducing genetically modified trees, designed for fast growth and high yield in given geographic conditions, would satisfy the demand for wood in many of those areas and save the endangered native trees,
The reading states that some events shows that this paintaing would not made by Rembrandt and
provides three reasons of support. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He explains that new research have find out that it is Rembrandt painting and refutes each of the author claims.
First of all, the author argues that Inconsistancy of the way the woman in the portait is dressed served that it was not the creation of Rembrant. This specific argumet is challenged by the lecturer. He says that by the x-ray experiment and pigmant analysis it is obvious that after original paintaing this inconcictant mainly occure. But the original paintaing put down the coat and present a luxurious fur collar.Thus it is Rembrant painting indicated.
Secondly, the author posits that this paintaing light and shadow elements do not fit together
but Rembrndt was the master of this element and could not have made such an error. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim that After removed original paintaing, new painting face apeears partially in shadow. Additionally, He says that original paintaing did not do this shadows effects after immitation of immideate paintaing this light and shadow effects mainly occurs.
Finally, the author asserts that this painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together, Though, Rembrant painting only paited on a singel piece of wood. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that this original paintaing actuaaly made on a singal piece of glued, after then to increase the value and gread extra glued included. Furthermore, lecturer says that researcher syas that this painting made the same tree's wood with the rembrant others
painting wood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...nts shows that this paintaing would not made by Rembrandt and provides three reaso...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Provides
...taing would not made by Rembrandt and provides three reasons of support. The lecturer ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...coat and present a luxurious fur collar.Thus it is Rembrant painting indicated. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...coat and present a luxurious fur collar.Thus it is Rembrant painting indicated. ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and shadow elements do not fit together but Rembrndt was the master of this elem...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... shadow elements do not fit together but Rembrndt was the master of this element...
^^^
Line 17, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctuaaly made on a singal piece of glued, after then to increase the value and gre...
^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Painting
...e trees wood with the rembrant others painting wood.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24100719424 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55038761641 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521582733813 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8458568447 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.076923077 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00714196475184 0.272083759551 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00277373212415 0.0996497079465 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00652218337871 0.0662205650399 10% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00311587673422 0.162205337803 2% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00442497519011 0.0443174109184 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.