The author states that a 4-day workweek policy benefits the employees as well as companies and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that the 4-day workweek policy does not affect too much on the well being of a company and individual Employees and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the shortened workweek may enhance company profits as employees would feel more rested and alert. However, the company would get much profit as the 4-day policy reduces the chance of errors.T he professor refutes this point by saying The four-day work policy would make company spend more, probably a lot more. He states that the 4-day work policy adds new workers to the company. They have to spend more regarding training new workers, requires more office space, more pieces Of equipment.
The company expects from the workers the same amount of work done By 5 days. Besides, 4-day work policy diminishes the possibility of overtime working.
Thirdly, the reading says that the employees would separate benefit by spending their time with family members and pursuing private interests.
The professor opposes this point by explaining that it is risky as well as reducing the quality of life, decrease workers job stability. He says, at the time of economic downturn, they may lose the job. Employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: T
...day policy reduces the chance of errors.T he professor refutes this point by sayi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, third, thirdly, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3631695539 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9849058958 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.545454545 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.