The reading and the lecture both discuss sea otter population. While the reading states that the roles of otter very important in the ecosystem and also based on investigating the number of otters become decline by both environment pollution and attack predators especially by predators. The lecture refutes this, saying investment represent predators most likely effective rather than others.
First, the reading claims the chemical pollution the long of coast Alaskan such as oil rigs the main source of killing otters and it causes to life-threatening infection. However, the lecture argues that this idea the otters killed by environment pollution is very weak .On the other hand ,most of the predators attack to otters and kill them and immediately eat by predators.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that the number of another sea mammal such as sea lion and orca decline by environment pollution and the lectures counters this point by stating the orca should change their diet for surviving and it cause to kill otters.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that the pollution not only main cause for declining otter and it should be other factors of the environment to focus environment pollution along the coast. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing that the decline of a number of otters explain better by orcas and definitely environment features such as shallow and rocky location have not declined the number of otters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed by environment pollution is very weak .On the other hand ,most of the predators...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
... by environment pollution is very weak .On the other hand ,most of the predators a...
^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ollution is very weak .On the other hand ,most of the predators attack to otters a...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
... change their diet for surviving and it cause to kill otters. Lastly, the reading ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'killing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: killing
...e their diet for surviving and it cause to kill otters. Lastly, the reading passage ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.317269076305 0.261695866417 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.128514056225 0.158904122519 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0682730923695 0.0723426182421 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0562248995984 0.0435111971325 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0200803212851 0.0277247811725 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140562248996 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0401606425703 0.0370669169778 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63728189086 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0160642570281 0.0208969081088 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.140562248996 0.128158765124 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00803212851406 0.0158828679856 51% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0114777025283 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1456.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 235.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.19574468085 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412765957447 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289361702128 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174468085106 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136170212766 0.113142543107 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63728189086 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506382978723 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.4805348853 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 29.375 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2494979899 49.3711431718 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.0 132.220823453 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 21.7502111507 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.878197800319 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 58.3111702128 50.5018328374 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.43137254902 1.90840788429 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.679920013993 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.208817826928 0.142949733639 146% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0971600632164 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.758820871751 0.631733273073 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149206335376 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.424419176651 0.266732575781 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115857149757 0.103435571967 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.547566459598 0.414875509568 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0255515497087 0.0530846634433 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.546158979114 0.40443939384 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374559490535 0.0528353158467 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.