The reading and the lecture are both about the effects caused by less reading on literature books. The author of the reading feels that reading less literature books caused negative impacts on several ways. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. She is in the opinion that even though people are reading less, possible results explained by the author are faulty.
To begin with, the author argues that people missing benifits such as intellectual stimulation by reading less literature books. The writer mentions that no other materials than literature books can provide benifits to expand our imagination and understanding about the language. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that other type of books also provide interllectual stimulation. Additionally, she says there might be some literature books without the accepted quality and those books may failed to provide benifits explained in before.
Secondly, the writer suggests people have lowered the level of culture by waste their time on entertainment activities. In the article it is said that these activities are intellectually underdemanding to have benifits. The lecturer, however, rebuts this argument by mentioning about the benifits that we can gain from visual media than reading books. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that with the changing culture visual media can provide more closer feelings to the society.
Finally, the author posits that with the poor audience to read books publishers spent less money on literature books. Moreover, it is stated in the article that this will affect negatively to future of literature because of poor standards of today's readers. In contrast the lecturer's position is that this happens due to the author's faults as well. He notes that with writing books that difficult to understand, people in the past might not be read those books eventhough they are interested in reading literature books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aused negative impacts on several ways. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...anging culture visual media can provide more closer feelings to the society. Finally, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...of poor standards of todays readers. In contrast the lecturers position is that this hap...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...interested in reading literature books.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33118971061 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73148428512 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514469453376 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7860844817 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5294117647 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408553475757 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13669290328 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106848768415 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259111482545 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884478671713 0.0443174109184 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.