In contrast to the reading passage that emphasizes, reading less literature has adverse effects for the reading public, for our culture, and for the future of the literature, the lecturer focuses on the opposite view. The professor in the lecture conflicts with the author about these effects.
Firstly, the passage states that only reading literature can stimulate our imaginations and creative. However, the lecturer explains that today, other sources such as science and historical books have high quality and can stimulate people's creative more than literature.
Secondly, in the text it has been stated that reading less literature has lowered the level of our culture. Additionally, the author points out that people are now willing to sit in front of TV and watch different programs or go to the Internet and read a Web page instead of debating on a novel book. However, the lecturer rebuts this by saying that these days culture has changed and people have easy access to much valuable material like TV and music that enhance the level of culture in general.
Finally, in contrast to the reading passage's claim that says, although there are talented writers, they suffer from the absence of audience therefore, this matter can damage the future of the literature, the professor mentions that we cannot blame readers, actually it is the fault of writers because they write difficult to understand.
In overall, the professor effectively challenges the claim made in the reading passage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, in general, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19834710744 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59053670199 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582644628099 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.4603383332 49.2860985944 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.777777778 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8888888889 7.06452816374 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430402471329 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166889521336 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103337301005 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214649234958 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847625041286 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.