The author states that the reading of novel and so literature is declined nowadays and explains some negative effects of reading less. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the points by saying that reading novels doesn't mean that reading of literature is declined and also it doesnot include that much bad effects.
First, the author says that novels intelletually stimulate the readers mind. However, the professor says novels are not the only tools to intellectually stimulate readers mind. Other geners of books like science and political books are high quality material which can intellectually stimulate the reader's mind.
Second, the author claims that watching TV and music video and reading web page chave lead to decrease in culture. However, the professor refutes it by asserting that novels and poems are not only avaiable cultural resources. There are lots of great cultural materias nowadays, such as great songs and movies which very valuble cultural contents. Also, she adds that the meaning of culture is changed. And the materials can have permanently effects on the audiences.
Third, the reading passage explains that there are many talented writters and reading less is regrettable. However, the speaker claims that we should not blame readers but writers of novels. Because novels are very difficult to understand these days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he points by saying that reading novels doesnt mean that reading of literature is decl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the author claims that watching TV and music video and reading web page chave l...
^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... speaker claims that we should not blame readers but writers of novels. Because n...
^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t blame readers but writers of novels. Because novels are very difficult to understand...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33802816901 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52085135013 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0691951647 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4615384615 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280164519143 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091870527817 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985225485788 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1709359394 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107050598859 0.0443174109184 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.