The author claims that the accuracy of the Chevalier memoir is skeptical and provides three reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the points and says that no memoire can be possibly correct in all aspects.
First, the reading passage explains that while Chevalier has claimed that he was wealthy but in fact, he was poor because he had spent all his money on gambling and parties in Switzerland, therefor, he was poor. Also, the professor admits that Chevalier had spent considerable amount of money on gambling and parties. This does not mean he was poor. She posits that Chevalier was wealthy and he had so much wealth. Although he burrowed some money from a merchant in Swiss, however, he had so much assets. Converting the assets to money had taken some days for him, so he needed to burrow some money. This does not mean that he was poor.
Second, the writer casts doubt on the accuracy of conversation between Chevalier and Voltaire and claims that memoire was written many years after the conversation. However, the speaker believes that Chevalier began to write every conversation each night, soon after them. After many years, they had been referred in many newspapers and magazines later.
Third, the author believes that the Chevalier had not been able to escape from the prison in Venice and his jailers were bribed them free. However, the professor explains that comparing Chevalier, other prisoners had more powerful friends, but they could not bribe them. So it was not easy to be bribed in the prison. Also, in some vanished governmental documents it is written that, soon after he escaped the jailors repaired the ceiling. Why they repaired the ceiling soon after his scape?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...a merchant in Swiss, however, he had so much assets. Converting the assets to money ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. This does not mean that he was poor. Second, the writer casts doubt on the ac...
^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in many newspapers and magazines later. Third, the author believes that the Chev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94076655052 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4229034183 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505226480836 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.687217023 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4117647059 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190347798279 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670595746981 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437328957883 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111741528044 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183126851784 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.