The article states that it is unlikely American companies in the US adopt new, ecologicaly friendly practices in order to recieve ecocertification. To support, it provides own reasons. However, the lecture cast doubts on tthe point by explaining that the USA companies will find eventually good reasons to earn the certification.
First, the author believes that US consumers are exposed to so much advertising and they would not value or pay attention to the ecocertified wood products ads. However, the professor claims that American would not treat ads dame and they make difference for the ads of independent agency and the products would be very preferably for them and it will attract international trust.
Second, in the reading passage the aurthor demonstrates that American consumers will not buy the ecofriendly products because they will be much expensive than other ones. However, the lecturer challenges the idea by saying that of course Americans care about the price. Then he asks who does not care about the price? But he adds that if there is small difference, somthing about 5%, between the prices for ecocertified products and unfortified ones, American will buy the certified one. Because they value the environment and they certainly would buy the certified one.
Third,the author posits that the ecocertified wood products is not convincing for American companies. However the author asserts that it definitly is convincing for the companies. Not only because they can sell to the foreign companies but also for competition with them. If they do not enter the market, foreign companies will enter to the domestic market of USA and they will the ecocertified products to Americans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is unlikely American companies in the US adopt new, ecologicaly friendly practice...
^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...nly would buy the certified one. Third,the author posits that the ecocertified woo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... not convincing for American companies. However the author asserts that it definitly is...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86568648413 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.460380498 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0480208128373 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185387034619 0.0996497079465 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210431494863 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0358600159214 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253997682269 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.