The passage and the lecture discuss the impact of nature disasters such as fire and storme on nature and how the salvage logging can be the adequate solution on both environmental and economical field.
First of all, the author states that the salvage logging cleans the soil, make a good place for the new roots to grow ups thus, helps the trees to recover in other hand the lecturer rebuts this facts by saying that salvage logging is in contrast making the soil more vulnerable by taking off his fertilizer elements.
Secondly, the author claims that salvage logging has other advantage wich is minimizing the number of the insects that bad for trees health, in other way the lecturer casts doubts by saying that the tree is the habitat for other creatures as birdies and other beneficial insects.
Thirdly, the passage states that the salvage logging creates a good opportunities for local population to find a jobs , while the lecturer says that those opportunities are just temporary and concern just people who have experience .
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 71
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
...that the salvage logging creates a good opportunities for local population to find a jobs , w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a job' or simply 'jobs'?
Suggestion: a job; jobs
...ortunities for local population to find a jobs , while the lecturer says that those op...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ties for local population to find a jobs , while the lecturer says that those oppo...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... concern just people who have experience .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, while, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 174.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99425287356 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48860393296 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 419.366225166 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 21.2450331126 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.808532274 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 217.25 110.228320801 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.5 21.698381199 200% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.25 7.06452816374 343% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29582947307 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172321590529 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409412815148 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172321590529 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409412815148 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 13.3589403974 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.0289183223 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.498013245 183% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.