Both the reading and the lecture are about the cane toad which destroys the other species by dominating the place they reached. The reading talks about the way to regulate ecosystem of Australia where the cane toads came and multiplied. The speaker of the listening says that the ways from the lecture on how to eliminate the cane toads are not effective.
First of all, the author of the reading thinks that building a national fence can help the regulating number of the cane toad. The lecture casts doubt on what the reading says. The lecturer remarks that the cane toad flows with their young and eggs and introduces through the water and they can carry to the other places. Stopping the spread of toad is not possible since we cannot control the water flows.
Secondly, the passage believes that volunteers can control the number of the cane toad by capturing and destroying them directly. The speaker of the record opposes about the reading. The lecture thinks that untrained volunteers may capture even native frogs by identifying wrongly.
Finally, the text recommend the way that developing a disease-causing virus to decrease the population of the cane toad. The way that suggested by author argued from this: cane toad is a origin part of American ecosystem. Removing whole cane toad can victimize on the entire ecosystem while it can break the balances between the species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r places. Stopping the spread of toad is not possible since we cannot control the...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y author argued from this: cane toad is a origin part of American ecosystem. Remo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97008547009 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45568882934 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521367521368 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6533914588 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4615384615 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427330929352 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163866073047 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847869578452 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269702790818 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540721516729 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.