According to reading passage, in twentieth century, beginning of industrial stage in the science archaeology cause serious problem in unveil and examine the old artifact in Britain. Whereas, the lecturer mentions that in 1990, the United Kingdom adopted new rules and improvement in guidelines. He gives the suggestion for specific problem made in article.
To begin with, the lecturer states that according to new guidelines before start the contraction, the site well examine by archaeologist. If any artifact found then, first it handle by local government and specific archaeologist. This suggestion for problem made in the reading passage that digging new construction site many artifacts uncover and start construction did not well preserve artifact.
Furthermore, the lecturer also helped to address the second point of the reading passage that inadequate financial support for archaeological research. He says that all research done by construction company and institute help to examine the site and preservation of artifact. Therefore, financial support to archaeological research by construction company rather than government.
Moreover, the article claims that few job and position available for archaeologists. Novice archaeologists have not paid for work. However, the lecturer emphasizes that according to the new guidelines archaeologists paid more than before. A lot of contraction site hire archaeologist to examine the data and research. In fact, increase the job position and career opportunities cause increase professional value of archaeologist than earlier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'handles'?
Suggestion: handles
...t. If any artifact found then, first it handle by local government and specific archae...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'few jobs'.
Suggestion: few jobs
...ent. Moreover, the article claims that few job and position available for archaeologis...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87012987013 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27111781585 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6870166568 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278515588499 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931353188983 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461930454805 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16355904388 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304828349135 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.2367328918 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.