The reading and lecture are both about the Torreya taxifoha, a tree grown in the north, but has presently declining in population in which solution are stated to this issue. However, the professor in the lecture undermines this cure for the decrease in the rate of the tree by elaborating on the disadvantages of this solution in the ensuing paragraph.
Firstly, the article states that the first solution provided was to replant this three in the same environment in which it thrived and originally habited. Since the temperature in the climate was cooler and wetter which comfortable in Florida. In contrast, the lecturer counters this stand point by explictly stating negative results about this approach. She states that, the other regions close had affected its temperature as well as the presence of global warming which has dried up wet lands.
Secondly, the author of the passage further expansiate on a different solution which implied that the tree be transported to a different location far from the north with a cooler temperature. Also, describing as an assisted migration. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this by mentioning a similar example of a tree who undergoes this process called the Black locust. So the damage was severe because it spreads rapidly which endangered other plants leading to their extinction. She claims that if this emerges, the result is usually unforeseen
Finally, the passage took another view describing that the torreya could be kept in in research centers to protect the life span of the tree in question and be observed closely. Furthermore, the professor in the lecture rebuts this, by confirming that it could be prone to certain diseases due to the absence of its wild life. In addition to the research centers are unable to provide adequate capacity to survive the disease.
In conclusion, the lecture takes a stand that the above mentioned solutions are not satisfactory and unsuccessful since the professor effective challenged the points acclaimed in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merges, the result is usually unforeseen Finally, the passage took another view d...
^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...scribing that the torreya could be kept in in research centers to protect the life sp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the points acclaimed in the reading.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18348623853 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79784259768 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556574923547 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8196748283 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.071428571 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225342186352 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730754208716 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524213056647 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109983177238 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559122373736 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.