TPO 20
In this set of materials, the reading passage state that the policy of letting it burn must be changed; because it causes some damages. On the other hand, the listening section brings into the reading section by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that Yellowstone fire damage to most kind of trees and destroyed them. However, the speaker believes that after firing, new plants and trees are grown; therefore, the diversity of plants and trees became large. In this situation, after damage tall trees, small trees and vegetable could grow in the new environment; also, many seeds need a high range of temperature for growing. Hence, They could grow in a new situation.
Second, the reading passage claims that the habitat of large animals are destroyed, and small animals would not escape from fire; in contrast, the lecturer believes is different. She points out that new ideal habitats are created by fire. for examples, rabbits could live in the truncated of trees that stay after firing, and they would live in them and hide from predators.
Finally, although the reading passage says that "let it burn" may destroy the tourism economy, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the tourism economy may suffer if forest fires happen every day. She said that for having a fire like the one that happened in 1988, a combination of different issues is required to happen at the same time. For instance, lack of rain for some month and raise in temperature. Therefore, as fires do not happen regularly in the forest, there will not be any economic problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...new ideal habitats are created by fire. for examples, rabbits could live in the tru...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06296296296 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46073416281 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3534146882 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236595194279 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800695435831 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397672226078 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131097443592 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391187536003 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.