The lecturer raises three arguments to cast doubt on the passage's suggestions that genetically modified trees are beneficial both ecologically and economically.
To begin with, the professor rules out the possibility that genetic trees are more resistant to bad conditions. Instead, professor points out that they lack gene diversity compared to wild type trees, and therefore are likely to die out under circumstances that they were not designed to deal with.
Secondly, contrary to the reading material that trees with genetic modifications have more economic profits, the lecturer contends they are even more expensive, citing the evidence that modified seeds always have a higher price. Moreover, farmers are supposed to pay it every time they use it, instead of collecting seeds from previous trees.
Finally, the professor asserts that genetically modified trees are actually more damaging to other wild trees, especially to rare species. Because they can grow aggressively, and hence compete for nutrients and light with other trees. Unique trees are vulnerable and may be competed out by these trees. This again contrasts to the reading that genetically modified trees can protect normal trees from overexploitation.
In conclusion, based on the arguments mentioned by the professor, genetically modified trees are not that significant as the passage asserts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63461538462 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89504524701 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600961538462 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2745976831 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423678339855 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182882123307 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753934658855 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231019882385 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100976728667 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.