TPO 22 Integrated
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points that stated in the reading passage about the ineffectiveness of using ethanol as alternative of gasoline.
First, the professor argues that ethanol does not add greenhouse gas to the atmosphere. As he states, although vehicles, which use ethanol, emit carbon dioxide to environment, we should consider that ethanol is made by corn that absorbs carbon dioxide when it is growing. Therefore, using ethanol as fuel counteracts the idea of more carbon dioxide emission in the environment. So, the professor repudiates the reason presented by the reading passage which states using ethanol and gasoline do not differ in global warming because both of them release greenhouse gasses to atmosphere like carbon dioxide.
Second, the reading passage mentioned that production of ethanol will results in severe reduction of available plants for other applications such as cultivating livestock. Also, it states that only 10 percent increase in need for ethanol in U.S will cause to assign more than 60 percent of corn in order to satisfy demand. Nevertheless, the professor draws attention to process of ethanol production that use cellulose instead of whole corn. As he claimed, cellulose is not eaten by animals, thus, we would have sufficient corn not only for livestock but also for manufacturing ethanol.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that ethanol will face with problem with gasoline in pricing if governments cut off tax subsides, because ethanol's price will increase significantly. On the contrary, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that more demand for ethanol results in lower breakeven point in production, so, the price will decrease. Based on his statements, if demand for ethanol will enhance three times, price of ethanol will decline 40 percent which means higher competence ability for ethanol in competition to gasoline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ntioned that production of ethanol will results in severe reduction of available plants...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...rcent increase in need for ethanol in U.S will cause to assign more than 60 perce...
^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assigning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: assigning
...e in need for ethanol in U.S will cause to assign more than 60 percent of corn in order t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, as to, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40066225166 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79880470016 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4500939169 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514050391905 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210266573976 0.0996497079465 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478648546606 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307259924005 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790637256339 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.