TPO 22-integrated writing
Both listening and reading part mentioned to opposite viewpoints about the possibility of replacement of ethanol instead of gasoline. While the passage lists three reasons that this replacement is not efficient and viable, the professor in the audio mentioned contradictory of those reasons and call into the question them.
First of all, the passage said that the usage of ethanol for the sake of releasing carbon dioxide is not helpful for halting global warming; on the other hand, the lecturer rejects this assertion. As he mentioned, although, the ethanol as the gasoline releases the carbon dioxide to the environment, as the production of ethanol relies on the growing the plants; the growing plants remove the carbon dioxide. Each plant requires the carbon dioxide for its photosynthesis; therefore, plants cultivated for the purpose of making the ethanol absorb the carbon dioxide released by the usage ethanol.
Secondly, the text posits the threat of food resource reduction for animals as one of the negative sides of this replacement. As assumed in the article, since the ethanol is extracted from the plants, the use of a big portion of plants for this purpose can reduce the available food resources for the animal. However, the professor casts doubt on the accuracy of this assumption. As he said the ethanol is extracted from the cellulose of plant which is the cell wall of the plant is abundant. Furthermore, this part of plants is not eaten by the animals; therefore, the production of ethanol does not threaten the food sources for animals.
Finally, meanwhile, the text asserts that the ethanol will not be as cheap as the gasoline in the case that the government does not financially support it; the audio part highlights the fact the by mass production of ethanol its prices will be decreased in the future and will not require the government advocacy. As he mentioned if the production of ethanol gets three times more than the past, its price will decrease by forty percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ubt on the accuracy of this assumption. As he said the ethanol is extracted from t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0421686747 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69978332813 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469879518072 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7683026361 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381367489238 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143910896294 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075353780269 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210363048561 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912632964907 0.0443174109184 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.