The reading passage suggests three discoveries from the leg bone of T-REX can provide much information about the actual animal. On the other hand, the lecturer refused those points and casts doubt each of the author's idea.
First and foremost, the article states that the soft and flexible substance found from inside of the channel that located in the leg bone of T-REX can be the red blood vessels. However, the lecturer made a counterclaim to this idea by saying that this can be the remaining of the bacteria that colonized the hollows of the leg bone. According to him, the bacterias colonize the hollow and often live organic material in where they live.
Secondly, the reading indicates that from the microscopic examination of the inner bone of T-REX, the researchers found spheres that could be the remains of the red blood. Nevertheless, the professor argued that the same spheres also found in the fossils of other animals that found from the place the T-REX's. He also said that those probably can be the reddish mineral.
Lastly, the author of the passage claims that researchers found a collagen contained in the leg bone. In contrast, the professor made a rejection to this idea by explaining that the collagen cannot last long like 70 million years, it is improbable. Furthermore, he said the collagen only found from the recent fossils such as humans'.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hose points and casts doubt each of the authors idea. First and foremost, the artic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93534482759 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51020139203 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530172413793 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4038768044 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326157008875 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131789980549 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894257237626 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189252644319 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063050019093 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.