The reading and lecture both discuss the possible explanation of little ice age formation. While the reading provides three ideas to explain the little ice age formation, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that the disruption od ocean currents caused the ice age foration. This is because it provides a lot of fresh water into Gulf Stream. So, the climate became more cooler. However, the professor questions this notion by saying that the disruption of Gulf Stream had cooling effect only at Europe and North American. However, at other places like Nizoland this disruption of Gulf Stream could not explain why these areas became cooler.
In addition, the volcanic eruption could provide the air with high amount of dust that blocked the sunlight. As a result. the climate temperature decreaed. On the other hand, the professor contradicts this point by explaining that the volcanic disruption added enough dust to cause cooloing in temperature. Also, it should produce visible effect. For example, in the past, people could see colorful sunrise or colorful snow like blue or brown. However, there was not any report that confirm that happened. So, this volcanic was not strong enough to produce dust.
Lastly, the article mentions that the decrease of human population was the casue behind this ice age formation because the forest trees left it behind without any vegetation. Consequently, this decreased the green house effect. Nevertheless, the professor questions this idea by pointing out that the human population increased again and the forest was not empety for a long time. So, they started to work on cutting the forest again to feed the population. As a result, the forest could not have enough time to cause coolong effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cooler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cooler
...nto Gulf Stream. So, the climate became more cooler. However, the professor questions this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ount of dust that blocked the sunlight. As a result. the climate temperature decre...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...that blocked the sunlight. As a result. the climate temperature decreaed. On the ot...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, lastly, nevertheless, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18150684932 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51751930535 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2569055504 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.65 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33609892584 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869102952565 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605010476104 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188879752987 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351496542144 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.