The reading and lecture both discuss Poery's trip to North pole. While the reading provides three reasons to support that trip, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that the national geographic committee according to poery's record and tools confirms that poery reach the North pole. However, the professor argues this notion saying that this committe is objective and the committee members were poery's friends. So, they funded this trip. Moreover, they could not examine this records carefully. As a result, this geographic committe could not tell the truth.
In addition, the reading mentions that recently, avery made the same trip and he took 37 days. So, this is match with the trip of peary which it took the exact period of time. On the other hand, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out that there is a big difference between the two trip's conditions. For instance, avry did not get food over the plane and he got different weather condition. Moreover, peary's trip was not favorable and it was in a different weather.
Lastly, the reading states that the shadow of peary's photograph is similar to the shadow of North pole. So, that is a good evidence that Peary went to North pole. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this point by explaining that the technique that used to take that photo is no accurate and it could not to be the exact position in the sNY. Furthermore, the primitive tools have not focus camera. So, this photograph was faded by time and bulired. As a result, we could not calculate the shadow of that photo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...geographic committee according to poerys record and tools confirms that poery rea...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e trip of peary which it took the exact period of time. On the other hand, the professor rejec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the two trips conditions. For instance, avry did not get food over the plane and...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is similar to the shadow of North pole. So, that is a good evidence that Peary went to N...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'focused', 'focussed'.
Suggestion: focused; focussed
...rthermore, the primitive tools have not focus camera. So, this photograph was faded b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91575091575 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45733768539 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531135531136 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2700762526 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5555555556 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306081638684 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927273446175 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724943583704 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169744046458 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607941461946 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.