TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss about the history of the man who was the first one to conquer the North Pole. However, the lecturer doubts about the truth of the story.
Firstly, although the committee declared that Peary reached the North Pole by investigating Peary's equipment. The woman disagrees with the statement. She thinks the committee offers the fund of money for Peary. Therefore, the examination may be bias. The committee will not investigate carefully because of the money.
Second, the writer offers the evidence that Avery made the same task in less than 30 days to support that Peary could make it, too. The lecturer argues that it is not fair to compare between Avery and Peary. She feels this way because Avery does not bring as much food as Peary. The food for Avery is supplied by an airplane. That is why Avery can make it in 30 days. It is not the same condition as Peary.
Last but not the least, for the lecturer, measuring the shadows in Peary's picture is not conveiencing. The lecturer refutes that the photo taken by Peary is too old to be identified. The photograph is fussy and fading overtime. As a result, using the picture with low quality to calculate the place where Peary reached is not wise and inaccurate.
For these three reasons, the lecturer does not believe that Peary was the first one to reach the North Pole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68181818182 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37161644853 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53305785124 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7235843257 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.9444444444 110.228320801 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.4444444444 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350839537502 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941830546811 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106920290569 0.0662205650399 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191424494959 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640604795646 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.3589403974 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.