In this set of materials, the author of the reading passage discusses three hypotheses of the edmontosaurus migrated to more warm regions in winter for surviving. However, the professor thinks that the author's theories contain some defects.
First of all, the author claims that in winter the plants didn't grow in Alaska's North Slope, the edmontosaurus need to migrate to more warm place to search the food. On the contrary, the professor indicates that in the past 100 million years, Alaska's North Slope was warmer than today. And there was plenty of sunlight to support the plants to grown. And the plenty of plants can provide enough nutrition to make the edmontosaurus to go through winter.
In addition, the author states that according to the skeleton found showed that the edmontosaurs lived in the herd. And many modern-day migratory animals live and migrate in heads as well. However, the professor asserts that not all animals live in heads means they are migratory animals and use an elk as an example.
Finally, the author raises the point that the ability of the edmonosaurs' physical can approach long distances. They can easily move far distances during the harsh climate. On the other hand, the professor refutes the author's idea by explaining that the juvenile edmonsaurs were not able to move that far distance at all. And adult edmonsaurs were impossible ditched the juvenile alone forewards to warm territory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...author claims that in winter the plants didnt grow in Alaskas North Slope, the edmont...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e other hand, the professor refutes the authors idea by explaining that the juvenile ed...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, so, well, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11016949153 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57561599608 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1205659061 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7692307692 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247024097255 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827826415156 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602931552141 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134533036596 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528129437807 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.