In this set of materials, the author of the reading passage explaining three methods that can prevent the birds fly through the glass make them died or got injured. However, the professor thinks authors' theories contain some defects.
First of all, the author states that we can use the one-way glass, which can reflect like the mirror, instead of regular glass. Because when the birds can't see through the windows, they won't try to penetrate through the windows. On the contrary, the professor indicates that like the author's say one-way glass can reflect. So if the birds see the glass reflects sky or tree, they still can fly through it.
In addition, the author claims that we can use painted glasses. When birds would like to fly through, they will see the color there and stop it, still, people can see out through the window, that part won't get painted. However, the professor disagrees. He explains that the birds still can fly through the window, which part is not get painted. Unless there is a tiny hole can't let them not try to fly through. But it is too dark for inside area.
Finally, the author raises the points that we can adopt an artificial magnetic to lead the birds to other directions instead of bumping on windows since birds have an innate ability to sense earth's magnetic fields. On the other hand, the professor asserts that birds only use the magnetic ability when they travel the long distance, such as migrating. Normally, the birds use their bright eyes to see instead of magnetic ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...f regular glass. Because when the birds cant see through the windows, they wont try ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... window, which part is not get painted. Unless there is a tiny hole cant let them not ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...et painted. Unless there is a tiny hole cant let them not try to fly through. But it...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, in addition, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76981132075 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1813018149 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5439548817 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2666666667 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49213438813 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162876822646 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101268173582 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289824833295 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841621261203 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 53.8541721854 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.