The author of the reading passage and the professor both discuss that whether the silver coin unearthed in the state of Maine in the United States is the actual coin that Norse brought to the United States. The author is against this idea and raises three viewpoints. However, the professor thinks that the author's theories contain some defects.
First of all, the author claims that the distance between the Native American site and Norse settlements are far from each other. It is impossible that there is a connection between Native American and Norse. In a contrary, the professor disagrees. He thinks that there are many objects found in Native American site are from other places which are far from their site. The Naive Americans may travel a long distance to North America and bring the coin back.
In addition, the author states that there is no coin be found at the Norse settlements in Canada. However, the professor questions the idea by indicates that the Norse may not have the long-term settlements, sometimes they are back to Europe, and bring all the silver coin with them back to Europe.
Finally, the author raises the point that when Norse traveled to North America, they knew the coin is useless to them, though the coin is adaptable widely in Europe. As a result, the professor contends that even though the fact, that the native North Americans didn't use the coin as money, is true, the Norse knows the coin is very appealing. It may attractive to the north Native Americans, whose use coin for jewelry, and may trade coin for Norse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e fact, that the native North Americans didnt use the coin as money, is true, the Nor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, may, so, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82156133829 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30452690141 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472118959108 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5402984747 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529368085709 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18685448023 0.0996497079465 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100928417526 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314549761564 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802218067919 0.0443174109184 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.