The passage and lecture are auging over ther question wehter Sinosauroptery were a feathered dinosaur. The author of passage lists out three reasons to refuses this argument that Sinosauropteryx had feathers. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges these reasons and she believes thesse reasons are convincing.
Firstly, the author of the passage, mentions that the lines on the fossils of Sinosauroptery bodies have been misprinted after death. In contrast, the lecturer points out these lines were from feathers. She asserts that there is no evidence that other fossils which have been found in this site, have had the same lines on their bodies. Furthermore, she states that the site have provide some conditions to preserve functional structure of the animals. Therefore, these lines were not produced on the dead bodies.
Secondly, the author mentions that these lines are from frills not feathers. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts this point and she chalenges this claim with some chemical expriments' results. In better words, scientist have found a kind of protein which is existed for feather not frills. Therefore, this protoein proves that this dinasours have feathers not frills.
Finally, based on the passage, the places of the lines on the fossils have been printed on the backbone and tail of Sinosauropteryx while these places are not proper place for fethers functions like flight or regulating body temperature. The lecturer, however, rebuts it and she asserts that feathers have another function and some animals use feathers for attracting mates. Moreover, there is some evidence that these feathers were orange and white. Hence, there is no doubt that these dinosaurs used these feathers for mating.
In a nutshell, the passage refuses that Sinosauropteryx were feathered animals, while the lecturer holds opposit view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...thermore, she states that the site have provide some conditions to preserve functional ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in contrast, kind of, no doubt, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39175257732 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65870583429 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487972508591 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9000481307 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338342936003 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113038353719 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504294032116 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177658970095 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889558490085 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.