The passage and lecture are arguing over the "cloud seeding" method as an effective way for decreasing teh hial damege to farmlands. The author lists several pieces of evidence to soppurt this method. On the contrary, the professor challenges all these pieces of evidence about the efficiency of this method, one by one.
Firstly, the Passage author mentions that the labrotory experiment demonstate the cloud seeding is an efficient way. In contrast, the lecturer refuses this point and she states that method might result different consequent in real life rather than labratory conditons. She says that this method may cuases even drought in real life. Therefore, the drought as the consequence of the cloud seeding, is so harmful for farms.
Secondly, it is said in passage that there is some evidence that proves this method is efficient in some cities in Asia. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this point and she asserts that these cities are air polluted and the pulliotion has some positive effects for cemical reaction between chemial materials used in cloud seeding method and clouds. As a result, efficeincy of this method in air polluted areas in Asia has nothing to do with cleand with some cleand rural areas in US.
Finally, the author maitains that some local studies about the local seeding, shows that, this method is a efficient way. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim and she points out that not only the ares which are studied in local studies have experienced less hail but also in other areas, throughout the contries, have had less hial. Hence, there is a natural factor that make less hial in country and this is not related to using the cloud seeding in studied areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cal seeding, shows that, this method is a efficient way. The lecturer, however, r...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98965517241 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41671990046 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5775168975 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8461538462 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820385806055 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349561832508 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264130159921 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053984456553 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272870271159 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.