Based on given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses about causes of strange sounds in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean which was heard by Russian's submarines between 1960 and 1980. The author states three theories to explain the strange sounds. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that calls of male and female ocra whales could be account for this sounds. However, the lecturer explains that ocra whales are living on surface of water and Russian submarines patrolled deeply in oceans. On the other, the ocra whales are easy to detect via submarines' sonar.
Second, the writer proclaims that giant squids were the reason of producing sounds. Yet again, the speaker underscores that these sounds were heard in two decades, between 1960 and 1980, then suddenly the producing of the sounds was stopped. However, giant squids continued to live after 1980s. Based on this, they could not be the cause of voices.
The final point of contention between the reading and the listening passages is other military submarines' technology. The author thinks the strange sounds may be produced by foreign submarines which are invisible to Russian submarines' sonar. On the other hand, the speaker explains that this statement cannot hold up theory. In the past, submarines could not able to change direction swiftly. Not only old submarines but also the new ones do not have a technology which gives the ability to change direction quickly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...female ocra whales could be account for this sounds. However, the lecturer explains ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...he listening passages is other military submarines technology. The author thinks the stran...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...bmarines which are invisible to Russian submarines sonar. On the other hand, the speaker e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, as to, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15725806452 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37260956431 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7087214243 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2666666667 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377741877554 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115340274061 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667867409007 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210548661706 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248297929369 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.