Tpo 34
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on the causes of Steller's sea cow's extinction. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that over hunting by residents of Siberian people caused this extinction. They need food resources in hundreds of years. While the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to him each sea cow's weight was about 10 Tones, so this amount for little native people was more than their need for killing them every day. As a result, they did not need a lot of them.
The second preposition offered by the writer is that environmental fluctuation in sea cow's food source -kelp- caused their extinction. However, the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that if such situation happened, it should effect to other marine animals like walls and fishes. But there is not any evidence and report of decline in them.
Lastly, the author proposes that European fur trader killed sea cows after their arriving to the island at 1741, which resulted to their extinction. On the contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. She explains that 100 year before coming the trader, the population of sea cows had been reduced, Thus, the extinction of these mammals did not related to European's over hunting.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the listening passage opposes the ideas in the reading passage according 3 above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...materials have a debate on the causes of Stellers sea cows extinction. The writer...
^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed food resources in hundreds of years. While the speaker views this issue from an op...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
...the extinction of these mammals did not related to Europeans over hunting. In all, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, thus, while, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02066115702 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47174111351 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623966942149 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.598206242 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7857142857 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395423037067 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113702819584 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122608633246 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19106416347 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104872890148 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.