tpo 10
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage.
declining the population of sea otter in the western coast of North America from California to Alaska
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on what has caused declining the population of sea otter in the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. The penman puts 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by the following orator.
First of all, the writer proposes that pollution of oil rigs and other reagents of factories had killed the sea otters. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to her, predators caused that tragedy because not only no one has found dead animal'carcass, but also this phenomenon fulfill the predator idea more valuable.
The second point offered by the author is that pollution decreases other sea animals such as sea lions too. in addition, predators such as Orcas prefer to eat larger animal like other whales in stead of sea otters. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that predator may change their diet from big animals to smaller ones. As a result, it is not compelling reason that pollution was responsible for disappearing the sea otter and other little sea animals.
Last, the reading passage suggests that only some locations in that coast are subject of that event, thus, pollution may caused that. However, the lecturer holds a different view. She explains that large size of Orcas prevent them to reach to shallow and rocky places and they only in specific spots killed sea otters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ther sea animals such as sea lions too. in addition, predators such as Orcas prefe...
^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
... to eat larger animal like other whales in stead of sea otters. On the other hand, the prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not compelling reason that pollution was responsible for disappearing the sea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99166666667 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4429604081 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7855792598 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368255608839 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121282575657 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918497410802 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196349493648 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059492047073 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.