The passage and lecture are raguing over the author of Voynich manuscript. The passage author suggests three persons that one of them might write the book. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges each person as author of the book and he believes that none of these people were the author of manuscript.
Firstly, the passage author proposes that Anthony Acham was the author of manuscript for some reasons. In contrast, the lecturer refuses this claim and he states that it is not fair that Acham as an ordinary physician scientist wrote those secret things. Moreover, Acham’s books about the plants, was a book with some information about common well known plant and had nothing to do with secrets. Therefore, he did not write the manuscript.
Second, the author maintains that the manuscript is a fake book written by Edward Kelly. On the opposite side, the professor rebuts this claim and he states that Kelly was a person who deceived people but he could do more easily to make fool people and earned money. In better words, this manuscript was written carefully while Kelly were capable to make fool people with simpler book. Hence, it was not necessary that he spent a lot of time for writing such a precise manuscript.
Third, the passage author notes that it is likely that Voynich himself wrote this book to sell it. On the other hand, the professor objects this point and he asserts that experiment have shown that the page and ink of manuscript are 400 years old. In this respect, Voynich might use some old books for making this manuscript, but it is impossible that he could find such old ink to write the manuscript.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d such old ink to write the manuscript.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82332155477 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38778287819 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501766784452 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2950179963 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216625484525 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093153997747 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05197880839 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139970143119 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171707765781 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.