TPO 36
In this set of materials the reading passages discusses that a method that calls 'cloud seeding" can be solve the problem of cased by hail pieces of ice the fall from clouds. While, in the listening the professor casts doupt on what is peresented in the text and believes that the effectiveness of this method is not clear.
Frist of all, in the text it is clearlt mentioned that some labolatory experiments support the concept that the cloud seeding is effective. However, the professor claims that this result in the real life is very far to happen because the silver iodide not only aviod from building hails but it prevent from rain. Therefore, using this method not only do not solve the problem but create a new problem that is serious decreases in the rainfall and lack of water.
In addition, the p[rofessor disagrees with this idea that the evidence that obtain in the Asian country can be practical in the unated state. She says that this result achieved in the urbn areas not in the countryside. In the urbn that this experiment dine there is a lot of air pollotion in the area and this pollotion are very favorable for producing rain in the clouds. But in th eunaited states that there is not same air pollotion using from seed cloud led to decline in rain fall.
Finally, in the text it is stated that some local study support the effectiveness of this method. The professor subscribes that this consequents obtain in the north and east but not just special region of regions so we can found out that this result is related to natural variation in the weather, not a specific result for using silver iodide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prevents'?
Suggestion: prevents
...t only aviod from building hails but it prevent from rain. Therefore, using this method...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...l and lack of water. In addition, the p[rofessor disagrees with this idea that t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47696758989 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8726732978 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.