TPO 40: Integrated
The reading specifies that there are three main reasons to support the idea that it would be impossible to maintain a human presence on Venus. However, the lecture casts doubt on this claim and brings up three arguments to contradict each point made in the reading passage.
First of all, the author asserts that the atmospheric pressure on Venus is about 90 times greater than the surface of the Earth. On the other hand, everything of the human at Venus would be crushed. Nevertheless, the lecturer states that it is possible to invent spacecraft which can have lower atmospheric pressure in order to normalize the condition.
Second, based on the passage, there are much less water and Oxygen than the Earth. The atmosphere of this planet, in fact, is mostly made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid. While the lecturer mentions the idea that it would be practical to produce water by chemical materials.
Third, the reading passage proposes that accessing the solar power is another challenge of being at Venus. The sun light is reflected by dense clouds. However, the lecturer asserts that these thick clouds in Venus would be helpful. Although they reflect the sun light back to space, the electric power would be produced by them.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid. While the lecturer mentions the idea that it ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, while, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96846846847 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46205271988 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0107826256 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8461538462 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413778859344 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142268274231 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801599902277 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196170294832 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113030664476 0.0443174109184 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.