The reading and listening sections both elaborate about whether humans can survive or not in the Venus' atmosphere. In the reading section, the author asserts to the claim that life on Venus is difficult, while on the other hand in the listening section, the lecturer refutes this claim of author by providing certain solutions.
The reading passage suggests that the atmospheric pressure on the Venus' surface too high for humans to survive and thus we cannot build a station in such atmosphere, Whereas the lecturer argues that the atmospheric pressure will be low 50kms above the planets surface and we can set up a station floating at that height.
Further the the author of reading section posits that the air of the Venus contains carbon dioxide, nitrogen, sulfur,etc instead oxygen and water which forces us to import water and oxygen from Earth. This claim of author is challenged by the lecturer by pointing out that water and oxygen can be obtained by applying chemical processes on available compounds in Venus' atmosphere rather than having reservoirs of oxygen and water.
Finally the author claims that very less amount of sunlight is passed on to the planet Venus as the planet's atmosphere includes dense clouds which reflect sunlight in large amounts. The lecturer however finds a solution for this problem by claiming that the clouds will be less dense at the height of 50kms and hence station will get significant amount of sunlight and also the reflected sunlight from the clouds below the station, which can be used to generate electricity through solar cells.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and listening sections both ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thor by providing certain solutions. The reading passage suggests that the at...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p a station floating at that height. Further the the author of reading sectio...
^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n floating at that height. Further the the author of reading section posits that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n floating at that height. Further the the author of reading section posits that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
...ontains carbon dioxide, nitrogen, sulfur,etc instead oxygen and water which forces u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving reservoirs of oxygen and water. Finally the author claims that very less...
^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ng reservoirs of oxygen and water. Finally the author claims that very less amount...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...is passed on to the planet Venus as the planets atmosphere includes dense clouds which ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, so, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0572519084 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46576997316 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511450381679 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 21.2450331126 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2458177138 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.285714286 110.228320801 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4285714286 21.698381199 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327769775222 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160752080106 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480644376412 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191341742839 0.162205337803 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584531984686 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.3589403974 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 11.0289183223 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.498013245 160% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.