The article claims that human can not have a permanent station on Venus and provides there reasons of supports. In contrast, the professor explains that it is possible that human have a permanent presence on this planet by a station is upon clouds of Venous; hence he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading mentions that atmospheric pressure at Venus is so high that crashes all aircraft, which are landed on Venus. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the pressure is low in a station, which is located on high altitude on Venus. In this way, the station never tolerates high pressure and human can have permanent presence on this plant.
Second, the passage states that Venous has not enough water and oxygen for supports human survival on this plant. Conversely, the professor says that scientist can make water and oxygen by chemical reaction and materials, which are on Venus. So, human have access enough essential materials for stay there for long time.
In the third place, the text explains that thick clouds in Venus reflect most of sun light radiation and do not allows human to use sun cell to generate energy. On contrary, if human have a station above thick clouds, they can use not only of direct sun light but also of reflection sun lights from tick clouds. Hence, human can use the solar cells as a stable source of energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'allow'?
Suggestion: allow
... most of sun light radiation and do not allows human to use sun cell to generate energ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.300380228137 0.261695866417 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.12927756654 0.158904122519 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102661596958 0.0723426182421 142% => OK
Adverbs: 0.041825095057 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0114068441065 0.0277247811725 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.152091254753 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0114068441065 0.0370669169778 31% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.32934219038 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00760456273764 0.0208969081088 36% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0950570342205 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0190114068441 0.0158828679856 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0152091254753 0.0114777025283 133% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1385.0 1645.83664459 84% => OK
No of words: 238.0 271.125827815 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81932773109 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348739495798 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243697478992 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159663865546 0.187439937562 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0840336134454 0.113142543107 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32934219038 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 49.7713450099 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6363636364 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0806677459 49.3711431718 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.909090909 132.220823453 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.0061115355 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.54166666667 1.90840788429 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.591116381653 0.549887131256 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.201498218855 0.142949733639 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10294122131 0.0787303798458 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.654758292915 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120218735444 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271360058556 0.266732575781 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952752565108 0.103435571967 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.281775828377 0.414875509568 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111945999853 0.0530846634433 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38940594299 0.40443939384 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068318704202 0.0528353158467 129% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.