In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that new restriction roles are unnecessary and also can have some negative results over the older regulation policy. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what was presented in the text and believes that the new regulation policy definitely is required for handling and storing coal ash.
First of all, in the text, it is stated that the regulation program is already exist, such as liner-special material that has effectively preserved environment. However, the professor claims that the present policy only includes new sites, not old ash ponds. The old ash ponds are severe threats for the environment, because through them a lot of ashes can leak into the soil and underground water that can create serious damage to the environment.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that the new policy can cause public concern about buying recycling materials produced from coal. She says that another hazardous substance, for example, mercury has been more than 50 years that present under strict regulation. Nonetheless, people have bought the recycled materials of it without any concern.
Finally, in the text, it is stated that the stricter regulation rules lead to an increase in electricity cost. The professor subscribers that it is true that the new regulation would increase cost, For example, it can cause energy production cost rise to 50 billion dollars. Nevertheless, It leads to an average increase cost of 1 per cent cost for the consumers which it is not a remarkable cost for a healthier and pure environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e says that another hazardous substance, for example, mercury has been more than ...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed materials of it without any concern. Finally, in the text, it is stated that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1679389313 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79318390865 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.107995718 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06452816374 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386028214389 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134223279906 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556930583275 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212969156942 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310642991135 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.